
Published: March
13, 2007 10:03 pm
Moving chemicals seems less likely
Ronica
Shannon
Register
News Writer
A representative of the Assembled Chemical Weapons
Alternatives
told the chemical destruction advisory board Tuesday that transporting
the toxic waste to an off-site facility is "not a viable option."
Mike
Parker, program manager for Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives,
spoke at Tuesday's meeting of the Chemical Demilitarization Community
Advisory Board and presented members and the public with an update for
the weapons destruction pilot plant being built at the Blue Grass Army
Depot.
The idea of shipping the chemical waste off-site has long
been opposed by a large portion of Madison Countians, but recently
resurfaced in the Army's attempt to save money on the destruction
project.
If the wastes were sent to an off-site disposal
facility, there would be no need to construct a SCWO (Supercritical
Water Oxidation) plant, which is the alternative destruction method
chosen over transporting the material.
Shipping the waste has
been a concern from the beginning of the destruction planning because
of the chance of the trucks having an accident on the Interstate and
the thought of taking the toxic waste into another community.
"How could we get another community to take the weapons considering the
risks involved?" Parker asked.
In fact, it is against the law to transport chemical waste via
America's Interstate system.
"It is required by law that an emergency condition must be declared
before the waste can legally be shipped," Parker said.
As
of now, the nerve agents will be destroyed on-site at the depot by
using the SCWO method, which "cooks" the nerve agent by using a mixture
of extreme heat and water pressure. The resulting matter is non-toxic
and can be disposed.
In the past, incineration has been considered, but was not a popular
destruction method among the public.
Many were afraid that the process could be dangerous because of the use
of fire.
If incineration were to be chosen now over the SCWO method, it would
add five more years to the project's timeline, Parker said.
Local
resident and former legislative member John Lackey questioned the
effectiveness of the SCWO method and said he would like to see more
documentation that the method has been proven successful.
"Great chemists have said that it's not practical," Lackey said. "And,
this has been going on since 1983."
The Department of Defense has recommended that the disposal deadline be
pushed back again until 2023.
This
is the result of the change in funding allotments for the destruction
project. The funds are generating from the same fund used to fight the
war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Parker said.
"If this community is
concerned about the timeline, they should write a letter to their local
representatives in the Senate and in Congress asking for more project
funding," he said.
According to Parker, the SCWO method has been validated repeatedly.
A timeline update was given Tuesday by Jim Fritsche, site project
manager, Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Project.
According to Department of Defense officials, the estimated time lapse
until the weapons are destroyed is 16 years from now.
Fritsche
gave the schedule forecast for the systems contractor, Bechtel Parsons
Blue Grass, which did not match that of the Department of Defense.
The
destruction facility's design was originally scheduled to take 27
months, but Bechtel estimates 64 months. The project's construction has
an original time frame of 48 months and Bechtel estimates 103 months.
When
including the destruction, construction, systemization, pilot testing,
operations and closure, original estimates show that the project will
be complete in 2011. Bechtel estimates it to conclude in 2020, but
Fritsche said that a ending date of 2023 was more realistic.
A pilot plant construction update was given by Tom Kurkjy,
environmental manager for Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass.
A
total of $20,850,000 in construction bids were awarded. Approximately
98 percent of the project's costs were kept in Madison and surrounding
counties, Kurkjy said.
The total task is about 11 percent
complete and includes many aspects such as soil and water
investigations, construction of an access road, perimeter fencing and
stormwater systems.
Construction to follow includes roadway
lighting, installing electrical equipment and telecommunications, the
design and fabrication of an access control building and the design and
fabrication of a vehicle control barrier.
Updates for the
weapons destruction pilot plant are given at each meeting of the CDCAB.
This year's meetings are scheduled for June 11, Sept. 11 and Dec. 11.
Ronica Shannon can be reached at
rshannon@richmondregister.com or 623-1669, Ext. 234.