CWWG

Army Reports Stockpile Is Stable; Key Argument for Incineration Is Undermined


pr_10.21.99cwstability.html Links to More Information on What's Wrong With Incineration
  • Events around stack releases verify Utah incinerator dangerously out of control
  • Letters, secret documents confirm Utah incinerator still endangering the public, workers and environment
  • Army report undermines key argument for incineration

    Chemical Weapons Working Group
    PO Box 467
    Berea, KY 40403
    Phone: (606) 986-7565 Fax: (606) 986-2695
    kefwilli@acs.eku.edu www.cwwg.org

    for more information contact::
    Craig Williams: 606-986-7565

    for immediate release: Thursday October 21, 1999

    ARMY REPORTS CHEMICAL WEAPONS STOCKPILE IS STABLE: NUMBER OF LEAKERS NOT INCREASING; UNDERMINES KEY ARGUMENT FOR INCINERATION

    An internal U.S. Army Soldier, Biological and Chemical Command (SBCCOM)
    report, made public for the first time today, "shows that the rush to incinerate
    chemical weapons is based on false arguments," according to those who
    advocate non-smokestack technologies for destruction.

    The newly acquired document, an SBCCOM "Information Paper" titled
    "Chemical Stockpile Storage Stability Status" dated October 8, 1999, concludes
    "there is no apparent trend toward increased or decreased leak rates in the
    chemical stockpile." For years the Army's Program Manager for Chemical
    Demilitarization (PMCD) has claimed that a growing risk of nerve gas leakage,
    particularly from spontaneous explosion of stored M55 rockets or aging agent
    containers, mandated rapid incineration and prohibited deploying advanced
    technologies.

    PMCD has proclaimed the M-55 rockets to be the most risk-significant item in
    the U.S. stockpile and has defended its 1984 decision to use incineration in
    large part based on the danger posed by storing these munitions. For example
    in July 1995 PMCD is quoted in an Arkansas paper as saying, "There are
    400,000 M-55 chemical rockets stored around the country, and statistically one
    could go off at anytime." And in an Alabama paper in July, 1995 another
    PMCD official is quoted as saying, "Most of the M-55s are about 30 years old,
    and because they combine the chemical agents with the propellant, there is a
    risk of spontaneous explosion."

    "Now the branch of the Army responsible for storage, SBCCOM, has
    documented in writing that these fundamental assumptions of PMCD's
    incineration program are false," explained Craig Williams, national spokesman
    for the Chemical Weapons Working Group (CWWG). "There is ample time to
    implement advanced agent destruction technologies which pose less threat to
    human health and the environment."

    The SBCCOM report specifically addresses concerns about the M55 rockets
    observing, "The results indicate that normally stored (that is, non-leaking
    rockets and undetected/unoverpacked leaking rockets) M55 rockets can
    dissipate sufficient heat to prevent autoignition. The results for overpacked
    leaking M55 rockets indicate that the autoignition probability is low but
    cannot be ruled out." Williams pointed out that the overpacked rockets have
    been segregated from the rest of the stockpile to eliminate the risk within the
    igloos where large numbers of "normally stored" rockets reside.

    As for ton containers filled with the agent HD or "mustard," which incineration
    advocates claimed were at risk from drain plug leakage, SBCCOM's Report said, "There was corrosion noted on some of the tested plugs however there were
    more than sufficient threads engaged to preclude any cause for concern. The
    survey indicates no increasing trend in leakers or severe corrosion problem,
    hence the recommendation was made to maintain the current visual
    surveillance program."

    CWWG's Williams concluded, "At last the facts have caught up with PMCD's
    rhetoric. Now everyone knows that their 'sky is falling' campaign about storage
    risk is designed to build support for chemical weapons incineration based on
    fear rather than be honest with communities about risks."

    The Chemical Weapons Working Group is a coalition of groups representing
    communities where the nation's nerve and mustard agent arsenal is stored.
    CWWG has long called for adoption of non-incineration technologies, such as
    those already demonstrated and currently being demonstrated under the
    Congressionally mandated Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment.

    - - 3 0 - -

    A copy of the complete Army report is available on request.



    CWWG

    CWWG Home Page

    Contact us:
    Chemical Weapons Working Group
    Kentucky Environmental Foundation
    P.O. Box 467
    Berea, KY 40403
    phone: 859-986-7565
    fax: 859-986-2695


    For comments about this WWW page contact Lois Kleffman.