|
|
|
|
|
The Goldman Environmental
Award recipients Silas Kpanan'Ayoung Siakor, Yu Xiaogang, Tarcisio Feitosa
da Silva, Anne Kajir, Olya Melen and Craig Williams are in San Francisco
to receive their awards.
(Nick Lammers/staff)
|
|
|
SAN FRANCISCO — Craig Williams' son was a year old when he learned the U.S.
government planned to incinerate 523 tons of chemical weapons just 8 miles
from his home in rural Berea, Ky.
Worried about the risk, Williams, a Vietnam veteran, pulled
out his typewriter and started writing. He is still writing.
Today his son is 23. The weapons — nerve and mustard gas
— have not moved, but the U.S. Army has agreed to a safer, water-based process
to destroy the stockpiles there and at three other sites across the country.
For his efforts, Williams today is one of six winners of
the 2006 Goldman Environmental Prize, a $125,000 award that is the highest
honor of its kind for grass-roots environmentalists andis often called the
"Green Nobel."
Winners represent each of the six major continents. The award
was founded in 1990 by San Francisco philanthropist Richard Goldman and his
late wife, Rhoda Goldman, heirs to the Levi Strauss fortune.
This year, all six Goldman winners have fought not just to
protect the environment but to force their governments to protect the voiceless,
rather than pander to special interests.
"This is all about accountability, transparency and oversight
of our own government," Williams said.
Williams, 58, has spent 23 years fighting the Army's plans
to burn the roughly 24,000 tons of obsolete chemical weapons agents stockpiled
in eight sites around the U.S.
The Army has long insisted incineration is the safest method,
but Williams had no faith in the military's ability to burn weapons without
mishaps that could threaten downwind communities. The communities are all
rural — "if the proposal was, 'We're going to burn these things eight miles
outside of San Francisco,'" he quipped, "this debate would've been over 15
years ago."
The Army is slowly changing, thanks to efforts by Williams'
group, the Chemical Weapons Working Group. One site's stockpile is gone,
and three others are being nullified via a safer process.
"In these environmental polls most people respond that (the
environment) is very important to them, but not a lot of people act on it,"
Williams said. "What it's going to take globally is for more and more people
to act on what they know to be true."
Other winners:
-Anne Kajir of Papau New Guinea will never forget the woman
who grabbed her, when she was a law student working as a paralegal in indigenous
communities, and insisted Kajir come to the edge of a forest that had been
illegally logged. It looked like a volcanic landscape.
"She said, 'I've lost a sacred place. Can you stop the logging?'
... I said I'd try, and I'm still trying," said Kajir, 32. "This woman is
always with me."
Under Papau New Guinea's constitution, 97 percent of the
country is owned collectively by indigenous populations and managed in trust
by the government. But government, Kajir said, is violating that trust and
fosters rampant illegal logging. Kajir has spent nine years fighting that
in the courts.
"It's not about going against development," she said. "It's
about how can you give the maximum benefit to the landowners."
-Olya Melen had to do something. The Ukrainian attorney,
now 26, had argued one of her first-ever cases against a government plan
to cut a canal through the heart of the Danube delta, a riverway every bit
as important as the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
The local judge had been sympathetic. From her bench, she
agreed the canal was awful. But her ruling favored the government on every
point.
Afterward, Melen encountered the judge, who was near to tears
at the water cooler. "She said, 'I'm sorry. I was forced to do that.'"
The subsequent legal fight — and the Orange Revolution
|