By Joe Bauman
Deseret Morning News
As the Army's chemical
weapons incinerator switches to a new effort, destroying spray tanks filled
with deadly VX nerve agent, a controversy over unusual plant emissions may
be nearing resolution.
Crews prepare
to move containers holding VX nerve agent at the Army's chemical weapons
incinerator at Deseret Chemical Depot.
Army photo/Chuck Sprague
The spray tank project started Friday at the incinerator, located near Stockton,
Tooele County. Stored at Deseret Chemical Depot are more than 800 container
tanks, each holding 160 gallons of VX. The material is so toxic that if a
drop smaller than the period at the end of this sentence were to settle on
a person's hand, it would be deadly.
A demonstration test showing how to destroy the spray tanks is scheduled
for August, said Chuck Sprague, depot spokesman.
One of two liquid incinerators used to burn nerve agent, LIC-1, remains shut
down. It was closed on July 17 "when a compound with characteristics similar
to VX agent was detected on the main furnace exhaust stack," Sprague added
in a press release.
While LIC-1 is idle, a second liquid incinerator is being used to process
VX agent and burn up spent decontamination solution. All furnaces were shut
down when the strange vapors were detected, but LIC-2 and the metal parts
furnace went back to work on Wednesday.
At first, plant officials were suspicious that mortar used in a recent rebricking
of LIC-1 was to blame. The assertion drew sharp comments from activists worried
about safety.
"Either VX nerve agent or its 'evil twin' came out of that smokestack for
three days, and the Army is trying to claim it's no big deal," Jason Groenewold,
director of the Health Environment Alliance of Utah, said in a written statement.
As recently as Monday afternoon, he added, monitors showed the material at
14 times the allowable concentrations for VX.
Marty Gray, manager of the state's Chemical Demilitarization Section, said
that if VX had been released at the plant, the levels detected were not dangerous.
But he emphasized it was not VX. "We know that it's not VX" because all detector
devices agreed on that.
The fact that a false alarm rang does not mean that whatever was released
is as dangerous as VX or nearly that dangerous, he said. The monitors search
for particular compounds, and anything containing those compounds will set
off the alarms.
But many other types of material could have the same compounds — even everyday
products.
In past years, when the plant was burning GB nerve agent (sarin), "they used
to have false alarms a lot," Gray said.
"With VX it's fairly rare that they have them."
The alarm was in a common smokestack that handles different parts of the
incinerator. So how do regulators know LIC-1 was the origin?
"You know what, we don't know for sure," Gray said in a telephone interview
Sunday. "They shut down that furnace." As temperatures fell, "the interferant
went down." They concluded that was the source.
"We thought they should have continued to look at other furnaces and we asked
them to look at other data." Officials are poring over records from around
the time of the alarm, looking for any other suspicious signs. They will
check old data from the Depot Area Air Monitoring System tubes.
When processing resumed at other parts of the plant, if alarms had rung or
interferant had shown up in the DAAMS tubes, "they would have been shut back
down," Gray said. But that didn't happen.
Groenewold is upset that Gray won't give him copies of the data they are
studying. "They will not release any information to me, which I find just
astonishing," he said.
Gray said when the state carries out an inspection, as it did after the alarm
went off, "we keep that (data) confidential until we have done what we are
going to do." That could include some type of enforcement action, if the
state decides anything happened that was contrary to the plant's operating
permit. But nothing has shown up so far that might lead in that direction.
While they are studying the material, it is in a status called "enforcement
confidential."