deseretnews.com

Utah                                                     

Sunday, April 18, 2004

U.S. lags in gutting chemical weapons

By Lee Davidson
Deseret Morning News

WASHINGTON — The nation's program to destroy chemical arms, which includes an incinerator at Utah's Deseret Chemical Depot, continues to fall further behind schedule as costs skyrocket, congressional researchers say.

"The program continues to falter because several long-standing management, organizational and strategic planning weaknesses remain unresolved," according to an update this month by the U.S. General Accounting Office, a research arm of Congress.

The GAO noted it has sounded similar alarms in many of the 25 reports it has issued since 1990, including one just last September.

But even in the seven months since that last report, it said the program managed to fall even further behind schedule and saw costs increase more because of "ongoing incidents during operations, environmental permitting issues, concerns about emergency preparedness and unfunded requirements."

All chemical arms were originally required by international treaty to be destroyed by April 29, 2007.

The United States plans to seek an extension of that deadline to 2012, but the GAO warned, "Unless the Chem-Demil Program is able to resolve the problems that have caused schedule delays to destroy the stockpile, the United States will likely risk not meeting the (extended) deadline."

Also, costs for the program increased from an estimated $15 billion in 1998 to an estimated $23.7 billion in 2001. The GAO said the Defense Department last year identified another $1.4 billion beyond that, "and this estimate is certainly going to rise further, given the information we obtained on schedule delays from fiscal year 2005 budget documents and from program officials."

As of last month, the program had destroyed 27.6 percent of the 31,500 tons of chemical arms it had originally stored at nine sites.

Deseret Chemical Depot in Tooele County originally stored 44 percent of the total national stockpile, and has managed to destroy about half of that so far, the GAO said.

A site at Johnston Atoll in the Pacific has completed destroying all its stockpile. A site at Anniston, Ala., has destroyed 5 percent of its stockpile, and another at Aberdeen, Md., destroyed 8 percent of its stockpile.

Other sites in Colorado, Oregon, Indiana, Kentucky and Arkansas have yet to begin destruction of their stockpiles.

The GAO noted that despite several reorganizations of the program, the changes have "not streamlined the program's complex organization" and many questions remain "about the roles and responsibilities of its various offices."

It added, "The program lacks strategic and risk management plans to guide and integrate its activities" — although it said the Defense Department reported it is working on that.

The GAO added, "In the past, because the program used a crisis management approach, it was forced to react to, rather than control, issues. We believe a risk management approach would allow DOD (the Department of Defense) and the Army to proactively anticipate and address potential problems that could adversely affect program schedule, costs and safety."


E-mail: lee@desnews.com