Defense Environment Alert
an exclusive biweekly report on defense policies
for cleanup, compliance and pollution prevention
Vol. 12, No. 7--April 6, 2004
MERCURY CONTAMINATION PROMPTS MAJOR CHANGE TO TOOELE FACILITY
The Army plans to add a major, costly modification to its long-running chemical
weapons incinerator in Tooele, UT, in order to prevent significant emissions
of mercury when it bums mustard agent munitions and storage containers, the
Army's Chemical Materials Agency (CMA) announced last week. The action would
add an agent neutralization process and mercury filters onto the incineration
plant.
The Army's discovery of significant levels of mercury contamination in some
of the mustard munitions and storage containers stored at Deseret Chemical
Depot prompted the re-design. While containers without mercury contamination
will be incinerated as usual, those with mercury - a heavy metal - will be
processed differently, CMA says in a March 29 press release. The re-design
is necessary because these high levels of mercury would largely exceed the
Army's permitted emission levels for its incinerator.
But citizen activists say the plan signals flaws with the incineration technology
and provides support for citizens' legal arguments over the Army's compliance
with waste characterization requirements.
The modifications will cost up to $55 million and require "unprecedented
cooperation" between the facility's contractor EG&G and other chemical
demilitarization contractors, CMA says. "It's a pretty significant effort
and it'll be the largest facility modification effort ever in an active chemical
weapons disposal facility," said Gary McCloskey, EG&G's vice president
and technical director in a March 29 press release put out by CMA's Deseret
Chemical Depot, UT. The depot stores the containers and munitions that are
incinerated at the nearby Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility.
CMA believes about 20-30 percent of mustard bulk containers stored at Deseret
have high mercury levels in their liquid contents or in solidified heels,
a CMA spokesman says. The Army believes the contamination stems from production
activities at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA), CO. The mustard agent stocks
at Deseret came from RMA, which apparently placed the agent in recycled bulk
containers, some of which previously contained mercuric chloride. These containers,
apparently, were not completely cleaned before reuse, the spokesman says.
Other incinerator plants could face similar problems. Mustard stocks to
be burned at the Army's Umatilla facility in Oregon also came from RMA, and
incinerators for facilities in Alabama and Arkansas could face these same
challenges, the spokesman says. But he says their furnaces already are being
evaluated for possible modifications.
Mercury is unlikely to be a problem for processing at the Army's Aberdeen,
MD, facility, however, because the facility, which neutralizes the agent rather
than incinerates it, does not have air emissions, the facility's stocks are
not from the RMA inventory, and the Army already tests for mercury in the
neutralized hydrolysate before it is shipped for secondary treatment. That
testing has not yielded high levels of mercury, he says.
In Utah, the Army plans to add mercury filters to one of its two liquid
incinerators, and will use a neutralization process and other filters to
deal with the mercury contamination. Each item in the mustard stockpile at
Deseret will be evaluated to determine if unacceptable mercury levels are
present, the spokesman says. Those within permitted levels will proceed as
usual through the incineration process. Munitions with high mercury levels
will be drained and then washed out to remove the solidified heel. The drained
agent will then be sent to the liquid incinerator equipped with mercury filters.
Meanwhile, the washout mixture, which still contains agent, will be neutralized
and the mercury content filtered out into a sludge. The wastewater byproduct
that results from neutralization will then be incinerated in the liquid incinerator
equipped with the mercury filters, to capture any residual mercury. The remaining
mercury-laden sludge, once neutralized of any chemical agent waste, will be
disposed of by a permitted hazardous waste disposal facility.
A spokesman for the Chemical Weapons Working Group (CWWG), a citizen coalition
that supports nonincineration chemical weapons destruction methods, says the
Army's plan at Tooele is "another indication" that the incineration technology,
as designed, "is not capable of dealing with existing stockpiles" of chemical
weapons. And it shows the Army's failure to fully understand the characteristics
of agents stored at all of its sites, which are fundamental issues in citizens'
continuing legal challenges to the operation of incinerators at four sites.
This is a "strong indication that our legal challenges under [the Resource
Conservation & Recovery Act] and [National Environmental Policy Act] are
sound and legitimate," the source says.
The CWWG spokesman also questions the wisdom of incinerating the neutralized
wastewater, noting the problems that arise in incinerating liquids, such as
impacts to downstream pollution abatement systems and monitoring capabilities.
The source also questions why the Army does not just neutralize all of the
mustard containers, noting that it seems to be another example of the Army's
"fall on our sword mentality of sticking with incineration."
The CMA spokesman does not expect the effort to cause much delay in the
Tooele facility's processing schedule. The Army first discovered the
mercury contamination in the late 1990s. It began to see "minor traces" at
the Army's Johnston Island facility, which has completed its destruction
campaign. "It came to a fore in Tooele," the spokesman says. "We've been
working for several years on solving this complex mustard processing problem
simultaneous with other efforts to keep the disposal program moving ahead,"
he says in a written response to Defense Environment Alert.