Neighbors pleased by APG decision
Army
gives up plan to put asbestos plant on base
By Andrew G. Sherwood
Sun Staff
Originally published February 13, 2005
Magnolia resident Bob Dillon, who lives about 1,500 feet from a site that
had been proposed for an asbestos disposal plant, was overjoyed at Thursday's
decision by the Army not to place the plant at the Aberdeen Proving Ground
after all.
"I couldn't believe it," Dillon said. "Things actually turned out right for
the little guy."
Dillon said he and other residents were afraid the chemicals used on the asbestos
could pollute the area's water. They were also concerned about transportation
and storage of the asbestos, he said.
The Army planned to enlarge an existing plant used in 1996 and 1997 to collect
asbestos from military installations in surrounding states and reduce it
to nonhazardous material that could be taken to a landfill.
Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, a Democrat who represents the area and who
opposed the Army proposal, released a statement saying: "I am pleased that
the Army listened to our concerns. An asbestos disposal plant has no place
in the middle of Harford County, where thousands of families live. I believe
this process should be completed in a less-populated area."
Judy Blomquist, president of Friends of Harford County, an organization that
monitors environmental issues in the county, said she believed the decision
not to expand the plant at the Harford base was wise.
"No matter how safe the plant would be," she said, "we just didn't think
it was a good idea for this area."
Dillon and Blomquist described their efforts at getting the word out about
the plant as "a big project."
Experts on white lung disease were brought in, letters were mailed to county
residents, and Blomquist's group asked that an economic impact study be done
by the Army.
"An EIS takes a long time, and I never heard anything else about it from
the Army," she said.
County Councilman Dion F. Guthrie, a Democrat representing Joppa and Edgewood,
said residents voiced their opposition at the five meetings held to discuss
the plant.
"Many of the residents were upset about the transport of the material," he
said. "The asbestos was going to be moved in trucks."