Birmingham News
September 16, 2003
Editorial

A closer eye:  Incinerator should look at new monitoring systems

09/16/03

Just because the Army feels it has good monitors at its incinerator in Anniston doesn't mean there's no room for improvement.

That's why it makes sense to look at upgrading the incinerator's monitoring system that should detect any possible leaks of sarin or other dangerous chemicals.

The call for better equipment is not just limited to the "usual suspects" - that is, the people who are fundamentally opposed to the incinerator's existence. Among those requesting additional monitoring devices is U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby, who expressed concern about issues that have arisen with internal sarin leaks, alarms and erroneous information being provided to the public.

"Given recent events ... I believe the Army should establish a new standard for agent monitoring by looking at more modern real-time systems for use in the chemical demilitarization program," Shelby said in a statement. "I believe the safety benefits that would accrue to the work force and the surrounding communities are well worth the time and effort required to identify and implement this new technology."

Shelby is right. Monitors are the first line of defense for workers at the incinerator and residents living nearby, and the Anniston facility should be equipped to ensure the highest possible level of safety.

There are several possible areas for improvement:

The incinerator's stack has a monitor that continually tests the air for sarin. But false alarms are a problem, and too much time (up to 90 minutes!) is required to sort out whether there is real reason for alarm.

Second, while the stack has systems to detect pollution such as nitrogen oxide, the incinerator doesn't have monitors for other hazardous pollution, such as PCBs, dioxin and heavy metals.

Finally, there aren't alarms on monitors around the perimeter that gauge whether pollution is escaping to communities outside the incinerator property.

The Army contends that adding more devices could generate other problems, such as more false alarms. That may be so, but it's worth investigating the chance that better monitors, or additional safety equipment, could better protect lives.