Anniston Star
September 10, 2003
ADEM finds 'minor' permit violations at incinerator
By Sara Clemence
Star Staff Writer
09-10-2003
State environmental officials have found “relatively minor” permit violations
at the Anniston chemical weapons incinerator.
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management detailed three problems,
involving pipe markings and liquid levels in drainage sumps, in an Aug. 26
letter of noncompliance.
An ADEM official said Tuesday that the issues did not endanger anyone’s safety.
“Not provided they’re corrected in a timely manner,” said Steve Cobb, chief
of ADEM’s governmental hazardous waste branch. “As soon as we brought them
to their attention they immediately started working on them.”
The Army’s project manager at the incinerator termed the issues “very minor,”
and said that managers would discuss one problem and work with ADEM to fix
the other two.
The incinerator was built to destroy the 2,253 tons of chemical weapons stored
at the Anniston Army Depot since the 1960s. The controversial facility was
completed in 2001 but did not begin live operations until August. It is now
processing M55 rockets filled with GB nerve agent, or sarin.
ADEM issued the environmental permit for the incinerator and has inspectors
on site around the clock.
The first problem outlined in the letter involves pipe flanges, the areas
where pipes connect.
“It’s just a requirement of the regulations that each flange carrying certain
types of material have to be marked,” Cobb said. Since the presence of nerve
agent means that many areas of the plant can’t be accessed without special
protective gear, the flanges have to be visible by video camera, he said.
Garrett said he believes the facility “meets the intent” of the regulation.
Pipelines that carry agent are color-coded in brown, and are marked on maps,
he said, and the building is designed so all air is filtered before being
released to the outside.
“So we’re going to take exception to this one,” he said.
Garrett said the facility would comply with ADEM if necessary, though doing
so would require sending workers into contaminated areas.
The second problem ADEM found concerned the sumps at the plant, the channels
that drain liquid from the floor in different areas.
In one sump system, ADEM said, the level of liquid in the sump was above
permitted levels for a more than 24 hours. It needs to stay below the low-level
monitor, the letter said.
Garrett said the monitor is three-fourths of an inch off the floor, and that
when the sump system is emptied, pump backwash takes it back above that level
of the monitor.
“Right now it’s just mechanically not possible to drain that sump totally,”
said Bob Love, project general manager for Westinghouse, the company operating
the incinerator. He said they would work with ADEM to move the monitor higher.
The third problem had to do with the sump system in the area where containers
loaded with rockets are brought into the facility.
In the letter, ADEM said the sump system contained more than three-quarters
of an inch of liquid, although it is supposed to be checked every day and
kept below that level.
Garrett said the sumps collect rainwater and that the daily inspection requirement
had been taken out of the permit, but accidentally left in the inspection
protocol.
“That is, in my mind, an administrative problem we’ve got to address with
the state,” Garrett said.
Love said the facility would comply with the requirement until the inspection
protocol is changed.
The Army has 30 days to reply to the letter.
Cobb would not comment on the Army’s explanations. “Until we have the document
in hand we can’t say whether we agree or not,” Cobb said.
“We’ll have to evaluate whether we agree with their position or not.”
Cobb said he did not believe any other problems had been found since weapons
processing began.