CWWG

Army report undermines key argument for incineration

armyreport.html

Links to More Information on What's Wrong With Incineration


Army report undermines
key argument for incineration

(Excerpted from the May 2000 issue of CWWG's newsletter "Common Sense")

An internal U.S. Army Soldier, Biological and Chemical Command (SBCCOM) report, made public October 21 1999, revealed that the rush to incinerate chemical weapons is based on false arguments. The document, titled "Chemical Stockpile Storage Stability Status" and dated October 8, 1999, concludes "there is no apparent trend toward increased or decreased leak rates in the chemical stockpile."

For years Army officials have asserted that a growing risk of nerve gas leakage, particularly from spontaneous explosion of stored M-55 rockets or aging agent containers, mandated rapid incineration and prohibited deploying advanced technologies.

The Army has proclaimed M-55 rockets to be the most risk-significant item in the U.S. stockpile and has defended its 1984 decision to use incineration in large part based on the danger posed by storing these munitions.

The report specifically addresses concerns about the M-55 rockets, observing, "The results indicate that normally stored (that is, non-leaking rockets and undetected/unoverpacked leaking rockets) M-55 rockets can dissipate sufficient heat to prevent autoignition. The results for overpacked leaking M-55 rockets indicate that the autoignition probability is low but cannot be ruled out." The overpacked rockets have been segregated from the rest of the stockpile to eliminate the risk within the igloos where large numbers of "normally stored" rockets reside.

As for ton containers filled with the agent HD (mustard agent) which incineration advocates claimed were at risk from drain plug leakage, the report said, "There was corrosion noted on some of the tested plugs however there were more than sufficient threads engaged to preclude any cause for concern. The survey indicates no increasing trend in leakers or severe corrosion problem, hence the recommendation was made to maintain the current visual surveillance program."

The Army's rhetoric--their 'sky is falling' campaign about storage risk--is debunked by data used in the October internal report. SBCCOM--the branch of the Army responsible for storage--has documented that the fundamental assumptions of the chemical weapons incineration program are false.

There is ample time to implement advanced agent destruction technologies which pose less threat to human health and the environment.



CWWG

CWWG Home Page

Contact us:
Chemical Weapons Working Group
Kentucky Environmental Foundation
P.O. Box 467
Berea, KY 40403
phone: 859-986-7565
fax: 859-986-2695


For comments about this WWW page contact Lois Kleffman.