Apr 19, 9:38 PM EDT
Defense Department
will not move chemical munitions from Pueblo Depot
By JON SARCHE
Associated Press Writer
DENVER (AP) -- The U.S. Defense Department will release
at least $300 million to destroy chemical weapons stockpiles at depots in
Colorado and Kentucky, and officials say they are no longer considering hauling
the munitions to incinerators in other states, for now.
In a letter to Congress released Tuesday, Under Secretary
of Defense Michael Wynne said project managers have been asked to develop
budgets with a goal of meeting a 2012 international treaty deadline to destroy
the weapons. Managers were told moving munitions is not on the table "at
this time."
Money earmarked in the 2005 budget to destroy munitions at
the Pueblo Chemical Depot and Blue Grass Depot in Kentucky had been frozen
as the Pentagon studied less expensive alternatives, mainly shipping the
weapons across state lines to existing incinerators.
Members of Congress from both states criticized that proposal.
The Pueblo and Blue Grass depots are the only sites where disposal facilities
have not yet been built.
"This was an unnecessary study whose
purpose was just to delay the Kentucky and Colorado sites," Sen. Wayne Allard,
R-Colo., said in a statement, adding that the change in position "is the
right decision and it is time to move forward with destroying the weapons
as soon as possible."
Allard and Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., said federal law prohibits
shipping chemical weapons across state lines, but the Pentagon intended to
try to change the law.
At the Pueblo depot, plans call for using water and other
liquids to neutralize about 2,600 tons of mustard agent stored in 780,000
weapons. The Kentucky site also will use water neutralization.
Earlier this year, a
Pentagon official said that design was put on hold because the original $1.6
billion price tag had ballooned to at least $2.6 billion.
"The Department of Defense is recognizing that on-site water
neutralization of the chemical weapons at Pueblo is the best path forward,"
said Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo.
John Salazar, whose district includes Pueblo, said he was
concerned not only about the loss of jobs the plant would create, but also
the possibility of transporting the weapons over mountain passes and other
potentially dangerous roads. He introduced legislation in the House several
months ago that would prohibit the Defense Department from studying weapons
shipments.
"I'm very happy they decided this is not an option," he said.
The Pentagon had frozen about $813 million that Congress had
approved for building the destruction plants. Officials recently released
about $70 million of that, enough to allow progress at both plants to continue
slowly.
Allard and Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, both members
of the Appropriations Committee, proposed an amendment to a spending package
to require the Defense Department to release and spend the money. Under the
legislation, the department would be prohibited from spending money earmarked
for the projects on any other program.
The full Senate is scheduled to vote on the spending package
this week, Allard said.
In a memo Friday to the program manager for the projects,
Wynne said he was releasing all the funds that had been withheld for the
projects in fiscal 2005 and ordered that the weapons be destroyed by the
treaty deadline.
"I understand that you already have information indicating
means and methods that balance these objectives without the necessity to
address the concept of transportation at this time," Wynne's memo said.
|