Chemical depot workers win first round of legal fight

By Staff
Feb 07, 2004 - 11:54:20 pm PST

PORTLAND (AP) -- Construction workers at the Umatilla Chemical Depot who claim they were exposed to nerve agent won the first round in their lawsuit against the U.S. Army Friday.

U.S. District Judge Dennis Hubel ruled that the government was negligent in providing emergency response when dozens of workers became mysteriously ill at the incinerator construction site near Hermiston on Sept. 15, 1999.

The workers were building the incinerator that will be used to destroy 7.4 million pounds of deadly nerve and mustard agents at the depot.

John Tucker, of West Richland, Wash., is one of 49 workers suing the Army over the incident.

"I am absolutely thrilled that a federal judge looked at the evidence and found in our favor," he said.

The workers claim the Army did not protect them.

In October workers testified that dozens of workers inside the half-finished incinerator building began gasping for breath, vomiting and coughing, and raced for the open doorway.

Some had to be dragged or carried out. They said they went to the first aid station but for two hours did not receive any medical attention despite repeated demands to be taken to the hospital.

In an 11-page ruling, Hubel determined the Army was negligent in assessing the situation on Sept. 15 and determining its cause.

The 14-day trial last fall was to determine whether the Army was negligent. In the next phase Hubel must determine whether there was a release of chemical agent, and if there was, whether it was responsible for the plaintiff's injuries.

If Hubel decides the workers were affected by chemical agent, he'll also determine damages.

"This opens the doors in Washington, D.C., to allow (the Army) to put in safeguards that should have been put in place years ago at Umatilla and the other depot sites," Tucker said.

Mary Binder, the Army's spokeswoman at the Umatilla Chemical Depot, said because of the ongoing litigation, she could not comment on the judge's ruling. The date for the second phase of the trial has not been set.