"The whole city of White Hall is ready for this
to happen," Morgan said Friday. "These things need to be destroyed, and it
needs to be done as quickly and safely as possible."
Last week, the U.S. Army announced that the furnace
system will go into action after years of preparation.
Today, crews will pull the first batch of rockets
from earthen storage igloos, place them within a protective metal tube that
looks like a tanker truck and haul them three miles to the furnace system.
The furnaces will tackle only two rockets during
the first day of operations. Workers will gradually speed up the pace to
burn 30 rockets per hour. If all goes as planned, all nerve and blister agents
at the Pine Bluff Arsenal will be destroyed by 2010.
That completion date would put the Pine Bluff
Arsenal in compliance with the international treaty that calls on all nations
to destroy their chemical weapons by 2012.
"The risk of storing the munitions is far greater
than disposing of them," arsenal spokesman Raini Wright said. The Pine Bluff
Arsenal opened in 1941, and weapons have been stored there ever since. The
arsenal houses 12 percent of the nation’s chemical weapons stockpile. As
years pass, the risk of leaks involving chemical agents increases, and the
sturdiness of the dirt-packed cement bunkers used for storage becomes more
questionable, Army officials say.
Morgan said he has no doubts about destroying
the weapons being the right thing to do.
"They need to be gone, not only for the treaty
deadline, but for our safety," he said.
Although it’s the first week for weapons incineration
at the Pine Bluff Arsenal, destroying chemical weapons isn’t new to the Army.
The Jefferson County arsenal is the sixth of eight
weapons storage sites to begin burning the nation’s chemical weapons stockpile.
Incineration is already under way in Umatilla, Ore.; Tooele, Utah; Newport,
Ind.; Edgewood, Md.; and Anniston, Ala. Weapons destruction has already been
completed on Johnston Atoll, a remote island in the Pacific Ocean.
Operations at these sites haven’t always gone
smoothly.
In 2000, a small amount of GB nerve agent escaped
out a smokestack at the Deseret Chemical Depot in Tooele, Utah.
And since the Army began destroying chemical weapons
at its first disposal site on Johnston Atoll in 1990, about a dozen workers
have been exposed to chemical agents.
Maintenance workers were exposed in 2002 while
changing pipes at the Tooele incinerator. In 2004 the nerve agent sarin spilled
on technicians in Anniston, Ala. Also last year two workers at the Oregon
incinerator entered a room where nerve agent was stored. The workers weren’t
wearing protective gear. The incident shut down the plant for five days.
Test runs at the Pine Bluff Arsenal haven’t always
gone perfectly, either.
Last year, the Arkansas Department of Environmental
Quality fined the U.S. Army and Washington Group International, the company
hired to destroy Jefferson County’s chemical weapons, $22,389 for three accidents.
Part of the fine was levied after lye, a caustic
chemical, leaked into the plant’s storm water system. The leak was discovered
when a worker’s arms started tingling after he cleaned mud from a catch basin.
The state environmental department levied the
rest of the fine because two monitoring devices were disabled during test
runs.
But a recent check by the Environmental Quality
Department gave the arsenal the all-clear to begin incinerating.
"We’ve been down there a bunch in the last few
weeks," said engineering supervisor Derick Warrick, a member of the team
of state environmental officials who will help monitor burning operations.
"We have issued them a facility construction certification approval, and
they are cleared for agent operations."
Someone from the Environmental Quality Department
will be on site at the incinerator 40 hours a week to make sure operations
run smoothly.
"Also, here in our offices we have a computer
hookup remote monitoring system to monitor the furnaces," Warrick said Thursday.
That computer records activity at the arsenal so if anything goes wrong,
Warrick and his team can go back to see what happened.
Incidents at other incinerator sites and the lessons
learned from them will help workers at the Pine Bluff Arsenal successfully
and safely burn the 3,850 tons of chemical weapons stored there, U.S. Army
Chemical Materials Agency spokesman Greg Mahall said.
Workers at other sites have already learned, for
example, that liquid chemical agents can gel or crystallize over time, making
rockets and barrels more difficult to drain.
"Some of our assumptions have proven false," Mahall
said last week. "We expected to find the same agent in the munitions now
that were put in them decades ago."
While few have spoken out against the potential
dangers of chemical weapons incineration at the Pine Bluff Arsenal, many nearby
residents say they’re upset about a study being done by the Army to speed
up the incineration process to make the 2012 treaty deadline. One option being
considered to meet the deadline is moving weapons at stockpile sites in Pueblo,
Colo., and Richmond, Ky. where destruction facilities have yet to be built
to sites that already have incinerators.
That study is ongoing, and the Army is expected
to present findings to the Department of Defense in early April.
The Army previously studied the possibility of
relocating the stockpiles to central locations for disposal but nixed the
idea because of worries about traffic accidents or terrorist attacks while
the weapons were in transit.
Mayor Morgan was among the group who went to a
meeting earlier this year to oppose bringing more weapons to the Pine Bluff
Arsenal to be burned. This week, he said he felt confident the Army would
confirm its earlier findings and destroy chemical weapons where they’re stored.
He pointed out that the incinerator near his city
isn’t fitted to process projectiles like the ones stored in Colorado and
Kentucky, and retrofitting the facility would be very expensive.
"It would take millions of dollars to retool our plant. It’s just not feasible," Morgan said.
This story was published Monday, March 28, 2005